Speed vs. Quality in MVP Development: How to Achieve the Perfect Balance

Should you prioritize speed or quality in MVP development? No need to choose. Here's 10 years' worth of MVP development wisdom to help you achieve both!

Sharing is caring!

by Julian Alessandro


As soon as someone decides to build a Minimum Viable Product (MVP), they'll start facing the inevitable trade-offs between speed and quality. On one hand, a short time to market is essential to seize the best opportunities. On the other hand, delivering a quality product is critical to capturing the attention of your target audience and gathering the right feedback. 

While striking an ideal balance between speed and quality in MVP development can seem like an impossible task, it really isn't. Experienced development teams can achieve that quite seamlessly, especially Agile ones, but anyone can massively improve their chances of success if they know what to look out for. So keep reading to learn the best strategies for delivering a fast and high-quality product, based on our 10+ years of Agile MVP development experience! 

Table of contents

That sketch sitting in your library? It’s time to share it with the world. From idea to launch, we can design, architect and code your MVP vision into reality in 3 months or less.

Why speed is critical in MVP development 

When it comes to MVP development, time is of the essence! And that's not only because you'll be the first to claim your stake in the market. On top of that, a swift MVP development offers benefits like:

  • Quick Concept Validation – An MVP's primary purpose is to test the waters and see if your idea is as good as you think. The quicker you get your product out to the market, the faster you can either validate your concept or move on to your next project.

  • Effective Resource Allocation – Successful products are developed based on actual user experiences and not on assumptions. So gathering feedback quickly will help you make informed decisions about iterations early on and avoid investing heavily in features that may not resonate with your audience. 

  • Precise Iterations and High Adaptability - Speed is also important after your initial launch. Working in short development cycles will help you arrive at your user's ideal product faster and quickly respond to new trends and market changes.

  • Early Funding – Many investors will want to see how your product performs in the real world before agreeing to jump in. If you want more resources to develop your product, prove that there's demand for it as early as possible. 

  • Faster Return Over Investment – This one is simple: the sooner you get your product out there, the faster you can get revenue from it. 

  • Build Momentum – Placing your MVP in front of the right crowd early on can help you build a strong brand with less investment. If they're impressed by what you've presented, early adopters will often create a natural buzz around your solution and get people excited about it long before you've arrived at your final product. 

Speed vs. Quality: the trade-offs 

While speed is critical in MVP development, it doesn't come without its trade-offs, especially in terms of quality. And even though MVPs are not about perfection, but functionality, the right balance between these two elements will vary a lot depending on the kind of project you're working on.

So let's have a look at key trade-offs you'll likely need to make to build your MVP faster and some scenarios in which you should prioritize quality, even if it means slowing things down.

When to prioritize speed

Feature Selection

To quickly launch an MVP, you must let go of your dream product vision and accept that it will only have what's required to achieve its goals; no more, no less. Building non-essential features demands a time that you can't spare at this stage.

UX and Bug Fixing 

It's important to have a usable and stable product before your initial launch, but it's okay if it doesn't provide the most seamless user experience. Prioritize bug fixes based on their severity and get your MVP out there as soon as possible. 

Design and Customization 

Entrepreneurs often have a hard time balancing functionality vs. design when creating an MVP, but it's well worth trading the ideal "look and feel" for a shorter time to market. Proving your concept will likely not require perfect aesthetics, so use temporary or pre-made elements, and focus on finessing and customizing things later on.

When to prioritize quality

Complex Solutions 

If validating your concept requires a large number of features, then it's worth taking the time to build them. There's no point in quickly launching an MVP if it won't provide you with the answers you need to move forward. 

High-Stakes Industries

When working in industries like finance and healthcare, mistakes and issues could come at a high cost. In these cases, thorough testing is a must and your development team should focus on security and precision, not on speed. 

Brand Reputation

Well-established companies usually have too much to lose and will prioritize quality over speed, even on experimental projects. A subpar product launch could harm their image and break the trust of current customers, so a quick time to market is often not worth the risk.

Factors that affect the speed and quality of your MVP project

There are several variables that can impact the speed and quality of your project which you should know about before you start building an MVP. 

Here's a quick summary of the aspects you might need to factor in.

  • Scope Creep – Scope creep is the tendency to keep expanding a project's scope mid-development, and it's extremely common when working on MVPs. Not monitoring and minimizing scope creep can lead to significant delays and quickly skyrocket MVP costs.

  • Team Expertise – The proficiency and experience of your development team probably have the highest impact on how well your project will run. You'll need a highly skilled and seasoned squad if you expect great results in a short time frame.  

  • Resource Availability – Adequate resources, including time and personnel, are crucial in determining what can be delivered and how fast. Insufficient or misallocated resources often result in rushed development and poor quality. 

  • Market Dynamics – Changes in market trends or competitor activities may demand adjustments to an MVP, potentially delaying your schedule.

  • Regulatory Requirements – Certain Industries have strict regulatory requirements which you'll have to meet before placing your MVP on the market. This can increase the time and complexity of the development process. 

Strategies to balance speed and quality in MVP development

That perfect balance between speed and quality in software development is something teams master through experience. But here are some strategies that will help you nail it, even if this is your first MVP development process.

Refine your scope

Begin by outlining the MVP's goals, then prioritize features based on how critical they are to achieving your objectives. Scoping is arguably the most crucial stage of an MVP project, so don't rush this step and get your development team involved.

More than advising you on the ideal feature set, your MVP development team or agency should be able to tap into their experience to help you design a product that has what it takes to be successful in the market. That's how we operate at NaNLABS, advising clients not only from a technical perspective but also from a business point of view. 

With more than a decade of experience in MVP development, we know that a specific UX will get more user signups than others, that there's a set of mandatory features for certain industries, and we use the full extent of our knowledge to set our clients up for success.

Have a look at some of our MVP case studies for real-life examples of how we bring our clients' ideas to life:

Set a realistic timeline

Even if your heart is set on a certain launch date, be prepared to negotiate on that. Working with an unrealistic timeline is never a good idea, and will only create frustration for you and your team. In our experience, a 90-day window will be enough for most projects, and we've even built MVPs in 45 days, but every product is different. Your development team is in the best position to estimate how long it will take, so discuss it with them and define a schedule that everyone can commit to. 

Keep an eye on deviations

Once the project starts, you will need to monitor your schedule to spot any deviations. 

Anything that's taking one to two days longer than expected already deserves your attention, as it could be a sign of a technical feasibility issue. Isolating and treating issues as early as possible will help prevent a domino effect and keep them from impacting the entire project.

Establish clear rules and processes

After planning and scoping your MVP, be smart about setting up the project's infrastructure, including your development environment and deployment process. If you do it right, this step will allow you to work better and faster! 

To help everything run smoothly we recommend setting up the following elements:

  • Linter Rules or coding best practices to guarantee consistency across your code base;

  • A clear folder structure to keep the different components organized and easy to find; 

  • A local deployment environment to quickly test the code while developing;

  • A staging environment for the user to test the features created and provide feedback as fast as possible;

  • A CI/CD pipeline to automate software delivery, so that the code is published as soon as it's done. 

It may look like a lot but setting this up doesn't need to take long. At NaNLABS we use our own project templates to expedite this process, and you can also use a boilerplate instead of starting from scratch.

Adopt a hard-core Agile approach:

MVP and Agile is a match made in heaven! In fact, MVPs are part of the Agile methodology so having your team adopt an Agile development approach will boost your chances of success. This means testing early and often and working in short feedback loops, iterating quickly based on user data. 

You can also implement automated testing and continuous integration to identify and address issues as they arise, reducing the need for extensive post-development testing.

Prioritize communication and client involvement

This piece of advice probably won't surprise most people, but it's still the reason why many MVPs fail before they're even launched. 

Bad communication will slow things down, lead to lower-quality results, and increase costs. So you must foster collaboration between team members and prioritize client involvement at every step of the way. 

As a minimum, we recommend holding client meetings at least once a week or at the end of each development sprint, and daily stand-up meetings for the team. This level of communication is key to managing client expectations, ensuring alignment between team members and spotting any issues early on.  

Key takeaways 

As you embark on your MVP journey, remember that achieving both speed and quality is not a "nice to have" but a strategic requirement for anyone trying to innovate in such a competitive market. Before hiring MVP development services, check if the team has experience with the Agile methodology and go for a well-seasoned squad. Experienced Agile development teams are used to delivering solid results at a high pace!

That sketch sitting in your library? It’s time to share it with the world. From idea to launch, we can design, architect and code your MVP vision into reality in 3 months or less.

Frequently Asked Questions About Speed vs. Quality in MVP Development

  • What is the difference between quality and speed in software development?

    In software development, quality refers to the robustness, reliability, and effectiveness of the product built, while speed relates to the pace at which it's developed and released.

  • How do you balance speed of delivery vs. quality of delivery in MVP development?

    Balancing speed and quality in MVP development involves strategic prioritization, an agile development approach, continuous testing, and cross-functional collaboration to ensure rapid delivery without compromising product quality.

  • Why is speed important in MVP development?

    Speed is crucial in MVP development because it allows companies to enter the market quickly, gather user feedback, and iterate on the product rapidly, gaining a competitive edge.

  • Why is speed more important than perfection in MVP development?

    Speed is prioritized over perfection in MVP development because getting a product to market quickly means gathering early user feedback, which is invaluable for making iterative improvements and ensuring the product meets actual user needs. Perfection can be pursued in later development phases.

More articles to read

Previous blog post



MVP Development for Enterprise: How it works and what sets it apart from startup MVPs

Read the complete article

Next blog post



MVP Development for Startups: Top 10 Dos and Don’ts

Read the complete article